Mitt Romney dont give a shit about the very poor Americans:

Meanwhile "Tent cities" or modern day "Hooverville" are springing up across the US:

www.telegraph.co.uk . . . - 'Tent cities' of homeless on the rise across the US. Homeless encampments dubbed "tent cities" are springing up across the US, partly in response to soaring numbers of home repossessions, the credit crunch and rising unemployment, according to a report.

Nobody here gives a shit about the 'very poor' since our 'very poor' would be considered 'middle class' in most of the EU and god damn rich in emerging economies.

And he's absoulutely correct in saying they have more support programs both state, federal and private than any segment of the population.

Now if he had said 'we need to liquidate the poor' than I would hvae dropped everything and sent money to this website

That's not exactly what he meant. In any event, Mitt is the Tea Party nightmare: the free-spending cryptolib Wall Street-backed RINO their movement was founded to kill off. I gotta admit---it's a real laff.

"free-spending cryptolib Wall Street-backed"

You mean like Sambobama, whom gets about 85% of campaign funds from Wall Street in exchange for covering for criminals like Corzine who loot from productive.

Surely you must see your own hypocrisy correct?

this MORMON faggot is SUCH A FUCKIGN IDIOT


what the fuck, fuck him he is an idiot I am not voting for him

fucking mormon

Surely you must see your own hypocrisy correct?
---
What hypocrisy? What did I say that's incorrect?

Of course he's right - the middle class is the power base for these welfare programs. Where do these dumbasses think the money comes from? Heaven?

Fix the middle class, create jobs and improve the economy and the issues with the "very poor" will be taken care of.

If you don't fix those problems, there isn't money to help the very poor. Common sense.

Typical: Euro degenerates and American libtards react on words without even trying to understand the meaning. Pavlov's dogs

What he has said is absolutely right. "WE HAVE A SAFETY NET". Get it, stupid faggot?

Yep, 0bama gave a whooping 1% to charity from his own stash. He gave trillions of other people money. Democrats and far left Liberals are like that.

Ooooh! There's a safety net! Woohoo! Everything's fine then! No need for concern!

“It’s like a doctor saying ‘I’m not concerned about the very healthy… or the very sick because, you know, morphine.�

God bless Jon Stewart!

CaptainSensible wrote:

Ooooh! There's a safety net! Woohoo! Everything's fine then! No need for concern!

Thats like a doctor saying I'm not concerned about the very healthy or the very sick because, you know, morphine.

Glad you found an idiot on your own psychotropic level to confirm your idiocy for you.

Guess we will have to add one more to the list of what Whitey Got

And so it continues,

Whitey got Broadband and WIFI, where my WIFI?

Okay, here you go, you are now once again equal to White with WIFI

Whitey got health care and a clean doctors office, how comes I gotta go to county where there is shit and piss on the walls?

Obama care

Whitey got an apartment, where my apartment?

Okay we will give you a Section 8 housing voucher and force whitey to build middle class housing for you to live in so you can gorilla that up to you fucking niggers

Whitey got a college education, where my college education?

Okay we will give you Pell grants, student loans, grants, aid

Whitey got a law degree and got a brain surgery degree, where my law degree and brain surgery degree?

Okay we will apply affirmative action in law school and medical school admissions

Whitey got a Sclade, where my Sclade?

Okay we will give you an earned income tax credit so you can afford a Sclade

Whitey got daycare for his kids, where my daycare?

Okay the State of Illinois, even though its $10 Billion in the hole, we will give you a voucher worth up to $18,000 so you can have day care

Whitey got a income tax refund, where my tax refund?

Okay we will give you $4,000 for each kid that you have in the form of a tax credit

Whitey got a house, where my house?

Okay we will force banks to issue mortgages with no proof of income no credit history and the FED will buy up all those worthless mortgages that you will never pay back because its not in your nature to do so you fucking nigger piece of shit

Whitey got a farm, where my farm?

Okay we just took care of that a week ago

This is about equalizing life and outcomes and it is what BlakFuk OlympDik thinks the Constitution should contain.

Assholes, the fucking poor in this country are given an uppper middle class lifestyle thru absolute transfer payments.

CaptainSensible wrote:

Ooooh! There's a safety net! Woohoo! Everything's fine then! No need for concern!

“It’s like a doctor saying ‘I’m not concerned about the very healthy… or the very sick because, you know, morphine.�

God bless Jon Stewart!

you just proved you know as much about America as Jon Stewart.

That's not a compliment CS.

Think whatcha.

Our poor are the same. Taken care of and still complaining.

Voters won't care. The poor have the sweet lives right now.

poupon_le_french wrote:



Our poor are the same. Taken care of and still complaining.

Voters won't care. The poor have the sweet lives right now.

The problem is that the dem's policy is making more and more voters poor in an effort to win votes.

Vote for me and I"ll give you other people's money.

Think whatcha.

Our poor are the same. Taken care of and still complaining.

Voters won't care. The poor have the sweet lives right now.

Yeah, I think Whatcha and I'm not telling myself "Gee, I wish I were living in a room in a hovel with 400 euros a month".

Not all poors are the traditional Welfare Queen cliché, sitting with a thumb in their ass and a flatscreen on the wall. Many actually work their asses off to barely make ends meet.

Jon Stewart's statement is accurate. Instead of thinking how poors could get out of their condition - we're not talking handouts, we're talking jobs that enable you to get above survival level - Romney dismisses the whole problem saying there's a safety net. Who needs a cure when there's morphine...

CaptainSensible wrote:



Yeah, I think Whatcha and I'm not telling myself "Gee, I wish I were living in a room in a hovel with 400 euros a month".

Not all poors are the traditional Welfare Queen cliché, sitting with a thumb in their ass and a flatscreen on the wall. Many actually work their asses off to barely make ends meet.

Jon Stewart's statement is accurate. Instead of thinking how poors could get out of their condition - we're not talking handouts, we're talking jobs that enable you to get above survival level - Romney dismisses the whole problem saying there's a safety net. Who needs a cure when there's morphine...

Capt, our safety net has been turned into a hammock.
It used to be a safety net that people would use for a year or two until back on their feet.

Now we're talking generations, not years. And we're not talking about just a few hundred dollars a month either.

There is section 8 housing, utility payments, welfare, food stamps, WIC, and now even cell phones paid by the taxpayer for an ever increasing number of people.

The payments always go up, and eligibility requirements always goes down.

Mothers get in fights with teachers because they won't declare their children mentally disadvantaged, there's a check for that and when the kid turns 18, they get their own checks.

As I said earlier, vote for me and I'll give you other peoples' money.

Sooner or later you'll run out of other peoples' money.

CaptainSensible wrote:

Think whatcha.

Our poor are the same. Taken care of and still complaining.

Voters won't care. The poor have the sweet lives right now.

Yeah, I think Whatcha and I'm not telling myself "Gee, I wish I were living in a room in a hovel with 400 euros a month".

Not all poors are the traditional Welfare Queen cliché, sitting with a thumb in their ass and a flatscreen on the wall. Many actually work their asses off to barely make ends meet.

Jon Stewart's statement is accurate. Instead of thinking how poors could get out of their condition - we're not talking handouts, we're talking jobs that enable you to get above survival level - Romney dismisses the whole problem saying there's a safety net. Who needs a cure when there's morphine...

Then you and Jon Stewart seem to agree.

Whatcha deserves more from you.

He needs more and more until you can no longer worry about him.

You do worry that he gets more don't you?

You are worried that his safety net is not generous enough, right?

Ooooh! There's a safety net! Woohoo! Everything's fine then! No need for concern!

How dumb can you be, Captain Fudgepacker? Yes, the safety net. Romney absolutely right when he is concerned about middle class than the poor. Here is a clue for you: Poor will get MedicAid. The middle class guy who is working his ass out but cannot afford insurance is not eligible for MedicAid. But he is paying for the poo person's MedicAid. So who should Romney be more concerned about, you dumbass?

Its like a doctor saying I'm not concerned about the very healthy or the very sick because, you know, morphine.�

It's called "Triage", and in an emergency, that's EXACTLY what a doctor says.

What's your (and John Stewart's) point?

WineandCoke wrote:

That's not exactly what he meant. In any event, Mitt is the Tea Party nightmare: the free-spending cryptolib Wall Street-backed RINO their movement was founded to kill off. I gotta admit---it's a real laff.

W&C, I understand your point. However, in American politics there is just no substitute for having a member of your own party in the White House. Hence, the Democrats are pining for Newt, and terrified of Mitt. That is the truth of the matter.

Trever wrote:

WineandCoke wrote:

That's not exactly what he meant. In any event, Mitt is the Tea Party nightmare: the free-spending cryptolib Wall Street-backed RINO their movement was founded to kill off. I gotta admit---it's a real laff.

W&C, I understand your point. However, in American politics there is just no substitute for having a member of your own party in the White House. Hence, the Democrats are pining for Newt, and terrified of Mitt. That is the truth of the matter.

They know they can beat Newt. Same as last election with McCain.

W&C might have a bit more credibility if he had ever found anything, anything at all wrong about Obama.

W&C complained about debt under Bush, but is now silent about doubling that debt.

If W&C hatse Romney, that makes Romney my guy.

poupon_le_french wrote:

If W&C hatse Romney, that makes Romney my guy.

I don't really care who the GOP picks, I'm voting for anyone thats NOT obama

nor are 99% of USA posters here, so the thread just brings the mor(m)on closer to their hearts. they are all millionaires except for the billionaires, and profit who will be once petropape gets going

poupon_le_french wrote:


They know they can beat Newt. Same as last election with McCain.

Saying they know they can beat Newt is a understatement....Newt as the GOP nominee would guarantee them a historic victory that would mark the end of the Republic as we know it. Newt's coattails would pull GOP candidates into the abyss with him up and down the ticket. With a solid majority in the Senate, and the Dems retaking the House Barry could ram through the laws intended to make Democrat rule permanent, such as full Amnesty and drastically hiked legal immigration limits. The entire US would be run just like Barry's friends in Chicago run Illinois.

W&C might have a bit more credibility if he had ever found anything, anything at all wrong about Obama.
---
Oh please. There's a Mormon Tabernacle Choir's worth of voices criticizing Obama on Fuck France. My modest baritone is hardly needed there. So I focus on other themes.
By the way, I actually think Romney would be the much stronger candidate in the general. His problem seems to be that a lof of his fellow Republicans think he's a fake and a phoney.

WineandCoke wrote:

W&C might have a bit more credibility if he had ever found anything, anything at all wrong about Obama.
---
Oh please. There's a Mormon Tabernacle Choir's worth of voices criticizing Obama on Fuck France. My modest baritone is hardly needed there. So I focus on other themes.
By the way, I actually think Romney would be the much stronger candidate in the general. His problem seems to be that a lof of his fellow Republicans think he's a fake and a phoney.

I'm paraphrasing a movie here, but there are many people in the Republican party and in the Democratic party who would rather feel good and lose, than feel uneasy and win. I am a Republican, and I'd rather feel uneasy and win.