A chemical engineer employed in France certainly earns enough to afford the 10,000€ fine. However, Turks in both France and Germany are mostly migrant labors performing low-paid low-skilled tasks. How is the French government going to squeez them for 10 grand? Furthermore, due to recent political tensions between the Euro-Pee-on Union and Turkey, will France have the balls to hang Draconian sentences on low-income Turks and to overpopulate French prisons with historical revisionists of the Armenian Holocaust? I'll cast my bet in favor of French (as usual) paper tigertry.

Here, the biological father of an abused and murdered daughter had to take matters in his own hands, because French authorities were too impotent to go up against post-war Germany. The Vichy government would certainly have had no problems extraditing this perverted piece of work:

www.smh.com.au . . .

wrote:

...A father has won a 30-year quest for justice for his dead daughter after a doctor he had kidnapped and delivered to court to face charges was convicted of her killing.

A Paris court sentenced German physician Dieter Krombach, 76, to 15 years in jail after he was found guilty over the death of his step-daughter Kalinka at their German home in 1982.

The girl's biological father Andre Bamberski had Krombach kidnapped and brought to France in 2009 after German authorities decided he had no case to answer.

Bamberski will eventually face court himself for the vigilante action which caused a media sensation...[/q)

that guy is fucking hero, but what he should have done was chopped of the cock of that asshole and let him bleed to death in a ditch.

In fact, he had his chance to do it, as they were on their way crossing the border into France. He hired some Russian mafiosos to arrange the physical end of the capture. If he would have lopped off the dick on the German side and thrown it out the window (better to have hidden it and told the authorities of its location way after the deteriation point of no return. That way, it couldn't have been sewn back on and it would have been proof that it wasn't severed on the French side of the border), he could only have become a German arrest warrant set out for mutilation. The Germans could then seek his extradition and await a return favor from French authorities.
In fact, a disgruntled plaintiff decided to perform courtroom cleansing in the same province where the prosecution refused the aforementioned extradition. I certainly hope it was the same prosecutor responsible who got popped:

www.dw-world.de . . .

wrote:

...The court's judge was reading out the sentence for the suspect, 54-year-old Rudolf U., when the defendant pulled out a gun and fired at the judge. He missed, and then fired three shots directly at the 31-year-old prosecutor before two witnesses in the courtroom overpowered him.

The prosecutor, Tilman T., underwent emergency surgery at a hospital but died of his wounds. The judge was unharmed. The defendant and victim's last names are being withheld according to German privacy guidelines...

As a Jew, Sarkozy could now pay the Germans an act of good faith, by rewriting history for them as well. Such as to revise the deathtoll suffered by the French during Dubya Dubya II or to declare the German invasion into France to be solely a myth.
One standard for everybody or no standards at all

www.nytimes.com . . .

wrote:

...The French Constitutional Council on Tuesday struck down a draft law that would have criminalized the denial of an Armenian genocide by the Ottoman Turks, legislation that has soured relations between France and Turkey...

...President Nicolas Sarkozy, who backed the legislation, vowed to submit a new bill with revised language. He has in the past indicated that he would push to see that denial of an Armenian genocide is made a crime even if the council ruled against the draft law...

"As a Jew, Sarkozy could now pay the Germans an act of good faith"



Sarkozy is not jew. Only one of his grand father was jew.

According to the Nürnberger Purity Act, he's still a Jew: