Les chamois afghans mouillés dans l'attentat contre nos militaires

Des soldats français ont encore perdu la vie dans le montagneux Afghanistan. Un combattant taliban isolé et infiltré dans la police afghane est responsable de ce terrible attentat mais, d'après nos sources bien informées, il n'a pas agi seul !.
Ces sources nous ont assuré de la présence sur place d'un groupuscule de chamois activistes qui militent pour la fin de la guerre et le retour des trekkeurs dans la montagne afghane.

Depuis le début de la guerre et la fin du tourisme sportif, les chamois locaux ont perdu leurs principaux fournisseurs de nourriture. Une diète forcée à laquelle ils veulent mettre un terme. D'ordinaire les chamois sont du côté des occidentaux qui leurs laissent régulièrement des morceaux de leur ration et veulent aider au rétablissement de la démocratie. Donc de l'économie de marché et du tourisme.

Alors que s'est-il passé ce vendredi matin ? C'est une erreur de traduction qui est à l'origine de la tragédie. Les chamois afghans ont cru avoir affaire à des chasseurs alpins. Expression qu'on leur a traduite mot à mot sans préciser ce qu'il en était réellement. Les chefs du groupe ont donc pensé que des chasseurs de chamois alpins étaient venus pour les exterminer. La réaction a été immédiate et mortelle, le taliban étant l'instrument de cette vengeance préventive.

Une terrible méprise qui pourrait avoir de graves conséquences pour les chamois français. Claude Gluéant, sinistre de la haine intérieure et des croisades, prépare d'ores et déjà un texte demandant l'expulsion de l'espèce présente sur le territoire : "un chamois reste un chamois, même français de souche, il n'est pas question de garder sur le territoire national des agents vendus aux ennemis de la France".

Lord_Bullshithouse wrote:

The only reason you French trash went to Afghanistan is because of the invoking of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty concerning NATO...... which requires NATO members to contribute when a member state is attacked.

Lord_Butt wrote:

-- Roosevelt to Churchill in a letter dated June 17, 1943

"I am fed up with de Gaulle ... I am absolutely convinced that he has been and is now injuring our war effort and that he is a very dangerous threat to us. ... I agree with you that he likes neither the British nor the Americans and that he would double-cross both of us at the first opportunity."

Lord_Buckhouse wrote:

simplefrench wrote:

"As I said earlier the French are unreliable and your comments prove it. When the going gets tough you can expect the French to run. So don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. It's the French way."


The french way is the following one :We have not been attacked in our territory. We did not know attacks because French police avoided them all. And nevertheless, we are in afghanistan.

We are too nice. Do you understand this time ?

It is not our war

You are looking for an excuse to leave. Then go. It is the French way to cut and run. Be true to your nature.

Cazeilles posted:

Sad to see you have no understanding. Still living in parents house ? How old are you ? You must be in your early 20s.

francois wrote:

Lord_Butt wrote:

-- Roosevelt to Churchill in a letter dated June 17, 1943

"I am fed up with de Gaulle ... I am absolutely convinced that he has been and is now injuring our war effort and that he is a very dangerous threat to us. ... I agree with you that he likes neither the British nor the Americans and that he would double-cross both of us at the first opportunity."

LOL ! I like this one.

Roosevelt chose Giraud against De Gaulle.....He lost !

Sore loser....

francois wrote:

Lord_Bullshithouse wrote:

The only reason you French trash went to Afghanistan is because of the invoking of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty concerning NATO...... which requires NATO members to contribute when a member state is attacked.

In 2001, article 5 didn't apply to France.

Check your datas, mister-I-know-everything.

Lord_Buckhouse wrote:

You can always tell when you have hit home with the French here. They all come out of the woodword to defend the "honor" of France. You fools have no honor.

"The french army is in Afghanistan at the service of the Afghans against terrorism and against the Taliban. The french army is not in Afghanistan so that Afghan soldiers can shoot at them," Sarkozy said.

Translation.... The enemy won't fight fair so it's time to cut and run.

How typcial of the war losing French. What clowns you are. No wonder the French have lost so many wars.

Cazeilles wrote:



Can you come with one argument to keep NATO troops in Afghanistan ?

jerrylewissux wrote:

Cazeilles wrote:



Can you come with one argument to keep NATO troops in Afghanistan ?

Pakistan has nukes, a politically unstable government, and islamic fanatics chomping at the bit.

Iran has islamic fanatics as a government, a mentally unstable "president" and they are building nukes.

You frogs of course will be of no use in any scenario but NATO would be fools to give up Afghanistan now.

Iran has already much to do with Kurdistan and Syria. Pakistan is supposed to be a US ally in the area. Am I wrong ?

We are not talking about an eventuality here. It's going to happen, it's already happening. Talibans will be part of the next Afghan government. Hamid Karzai is negotiating with them with White House blessing. In this situation, I don't want to see any French soldiers die for a doomed country.

Fuck off and bring them back home.

jerrylewissux wrote:


To do so for his political reasons is almost treasonous.

Cazeilles wrote:

Pakistan is supposed to be a US ally in the area. Am I wrong ?

Pakistan friendly fire deaths were due to "errors" by US officers

American officers gave the wrong coordinates to their Pakistani counterparts as they sought clearance for the air strike that killed 24 friendly troops last weekend, admit officials in both countries.

www.telegraph.co.uk . . .

That's what I am saying. With Obama and his Afghan agenda, I don't want to see any French die for a fucked up country.

Nappybonesapart wrote:

Mulberry, for your knowledge
Malaya 1950s Commonwealth vs commies. commies lost
Oman to 1976, Rosbifs again

Karl_galster wrote:

That's a sad post for four soldiers killed fighting in afghanistan.

sorry no k for that one.