FF News On posting private messages (karma: 3)
en>fr fr>en By shon  Comments: 594, member since Thu Mar 11, 1999On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:04 AM
Posting a private message is frowned upon, but is not a violation of the Terms of Service (TOS) as long as no real name, home address, work address, phone numbers, etc. are revealed. That information shall forever remain private so that people are not harassed into silence.
People in the past have posted PM's, some as a parody, and we've had some good fun as a result. (CAP comes to mind, here.)
An analogue in the real world is publishing a snail-mailed letter or email you received. This happens all the time, and is an important element of journalism. I make it a point to publish FF emails, for example, in the Fan Mail section. Even when copyright is claimed on the original work, the "fair use" doctrine permits publication for academic, news reporting, criticism and parody.
p.s. BALM makes a good case for preserving privacy. However, while privacy is important, in this case, free speech trumps it (with the aforementioned caveat about not publishing personal identifying information).
Feel free to discuss...
Shon 40 Replies to On posting private messages |
re: On posting private messages en>fr fr>en By TiredOfFrogs Comments: 10621, member since Thu Nov 04, 2004On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:08 AM
sounds reasonable |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By whizz2  Comments: 18617, member since Wed Apr 23, 2003On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:10 AM
Sounds fair. Won't happen again.
Unless my account gets messed up with unfairly again. |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By badab Comments: 6911, member since Sun Apr 27, 2003On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:13 AM
aw mom, you never let us have any fun. |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By Nancy_Davis  Comments: 6309, member since Thu Jan 26, 2006On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:13 AM
Shon, please restore Whizz's karmas that were unfairly stolen.
Thank you. |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By whizz2  Comments: 18617, member since Wed Apr 23, 2003On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:14 AM
Yes, I need to K Nancy. |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By Death_To_France Comments: 1881, member since Tue Jan 04, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:18 AM
People who DELIBERATELY break the rules should loose their Karma... will make them think twice before doing so again. |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By whizz2  Comments: 18617, member since Wed Apr 23, 2003On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:21 AM
Edited by whizz2 (63630) on 2007-08-16 11:23:15
People who DELIBERATELY break the rules should loose their Karma... will make them think twice before doing so again.
You must really be the life of the party at your office. |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 4)
en>fr fr>en By CafeduMerde Comments: 8465, member since Fri Dec 03, 2004On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:26 AM
A wise decision.....
Bans should only be used for blantant privacy violations, Trolls and spammers...
not silly disagreements......
By the Way...
Whizzes address is
2405 Surrender Street
Paris France...
OH NO!!! IM A GONER!!!! |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By Death_To_France Comments: 1881, member since Tue Jan 04, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:27 AM
whizz2 wrote:
People who DELIBERATELY break the rules should loose their Karma... will make them think twice before doing so again.
You must really be the life of the party at your office.
Assumptions are great aren't they? I don't work in a office, and you got what you deserved. |
re: On posting private messages en>fr fr>en By whizz2  Comments: 18617, member since Wed Apr 23, 2003On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:31 AM
I don't work in a office, and you got what you deserved
Are the two propositions related somehow? |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By letarsier59  Comments: 10419, member since Thu Jan 20, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:33 AM
People who DELIBERATELY break the rules should loose their Karma... will make them think twice before doing so again.
Exactly, and this is why Whizz's karma has to be restored, according to Shon:
Posting a private message is frowned upon, but is not a violation of the Terms of Service (TOS) |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By Death_To_France Comments: 1881, member since Tue Jan 04, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:36 AM
whizz2 wrote:
I don't work in a office, and you got what you deserved
Are the two propositions related somehow?
Wow, no wonder the majority here hates you. Your arguments are like Ledzeps.... "I know you are, but what am I?" |
re: On posting private messages en>fr fr>en By Global_Village  Comments: 8742, member since Sun Aug 07, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:38 AM
Whizzes address is
2405 Surrender Street
Paris France...
OH NO!!! IM A GONER!!!!
Did I ever tell you that you that you're such a barrel of laugh? |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By Death_To_France Comments: 1881, member since Tue Jan 04, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:39 AM
letarsier59 wrote:
People who DELIBERATELY break the rules should loose their Karma... will make them think twice before doing so again.
Exactly, and this is why Whizz's karma has to be restored, according to Shon:
Quote from Whizz.
Just a point I'd like to make.
I was banned for violating TOS, which I did.
I did pursue BALM through his threads, |
re: On posting private messages en>fr fr>en By Dewi_Sant Comments: 21264, member since Wed Jul 06, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:42 AM
Whizz
You must really be the life of the party at your office.
You must really be the life and soul of the party at your office. |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By letarsier59  Comments: 10419, member since Thu Jan 20, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:43 AM
Whizz wrote this sentence in an other thread and before Shon stated that this was not against the rules.
Now, feel free to start your own flame against the owner of this website if you think that his estimation of the TOS are wrong. |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By Nancy_Davis  Comments: 6309, member since Thu Jan 26, 2006On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:44 AM
Quote from Whizz.
Just a point I'd like to make.
I was banned for violating TOS, which I did.
I did pursue BALM through his threads,
So what? How many people stalk others from thread to thread with no action ever taken against them? I have several stalkers myself but it would never cross my mind to be a sniveling cunt like BALM. He could do the same thing I do, ignore them. Of course BALM isn't smart enough to think of that. |
re: On posting private messages en>fr fr>en By ledzep Comments: 14987, member since Tue Jul 12, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:44 AM
Edited by ledzep (77411) on 2007-08-16 11:50:22
DatedinFrance,
The majority of what, the 5 to 10 retards who pretend to know something other than donut flavours and nuclear bombardment is the answer to all.
Believe me when I say that Whizz or myself will survive your vaunted attack.
BTW would you still like to lick my feet or has the offer expired? |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 2)
en>fr fr>en By I_Had_A_Dream Comments: 9620, member since Wed Dec 17, 2003On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:48 AM
|
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By whizz2  Comments: 18617, member since Wed Apr 23, 2003On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:49 AM
Exactly my point Nancy, thank you.
no wonder the majority here hates you
Starspangled chevy and you make up the three Stooges, not a majority. |
re: On posting private messages en>fr fr>en By Dewi_Sant Comments: 21264, member since Wed Jul 06, 2005On Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:54 AM
Shon -
Dear God
I hope you are ready for an attack by Balm the Terrible AKA My laws by amoeba & Saw yob blame yam etc
he has SPOKEN and DECLARED in capitol letters even
post PM's is a NO NO - is that plain enough for you
so please either get ready to retract the statement or ditch the tosser ASAP - it's going 2 the dog's ![:] :]](/images/blue/emoticons/joy.gif) |
|
re: On posting private messages en>fr fr>en By chevy Comments: 6903, member since Tue Nov 16, 2004On Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:00 PM
no wonder the majority here hates you
Starspangled chevy and you make up the three Stooges, not a majority.
Glad we could be of service wizzie. |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By ArthurH Comments: 15418, member since Thu Oct 17, 2002On Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:02 PM
Great post from SHON !! (who is god btw ..)
Indeed BALM trying to pass PMs as highly precise and factual private info is just grotesque, exactly like he is himself.
The thing is SHON, now, it is obvious that little Balmy boy cannot remain a mod : he completely lost face even if he didn't even have one in the first place.
So you need to fire his ass soon and nominate someone else : I say either RockOff or Rev_al |
re: On posting private messages (karma: 1)
en>fr fr>en By I_Had_A_Dream Comments: 9620, member since Wed Dec 17, 2003On Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:07 PM
BALM makes a good case for preserving privacy. However, while privacy is important, in this case, free speech trumps it
|